Richard>>

[Muff]

Are any of these guys going to get moved to the confirmed cheaters board. http://adultwebmasterinfo.com/ubb/confused.gif

that goof turkish tgp is still trying to hotlink pictures even though the files have been renamed!

Muff

[richard]

I can move all the cheaters over to the "confirmed" cheats board, but really, what good does it do?

Do you all think we need a confirmed cheats board?

[CyberDruid]

I dont think so.
We might need just a list with all cheater domains.

[shane]

a list with cheater domains sounds good

[Due]

Yes that is what the confirmed cheaters board are for. so we can find the confirmed cheaters isntead of starting to blacklist everyone that end up at the unconfirmed bopard

[Muff]

I think we need something what good is it to have them pile up in here? when the are just acquisitions. you should be judge and jury. and ill vote for that. we bring the evidence and show you the cheaters. why would i continue to try expose them if they just sit in the possible cheaters area.

thats like saying fuck everyone else!I know hes a cheat ill blacklist him but everyone else can try and catch him.

Muff

[Muff]

even a list is good as long as people know he or she is has been caught cheating!

right now as I speak that moron turkish tgp is still trying to hotlink pictures that arent even there.

Muff

[richard]

so far as hotlinking goes, learn .htaccess syntax and stop it.

[Muff]

.htaccess is great but what about strain on the CPU when you have alot of vists. I heard it can be known to slow servers down considerably considering it has to check the refferer everytime time there is a request?

Muff

[richard]

Apache logs the referer (along with loads of other stuff) anyway, so there shouldn't be any extra strain really - except perhaps having to CHECK the .htaccess file each time, but it would be minimal.

[Muff]

Thanks Richard. Ill definately check it out. fortuanetly I myself havent had a problem with hotlinking. but better safe than sorry.

Muff

[richard]

Thinking some more about it, i would assume that apache would check the files "modified last tim at.." value to determine if any changed had been made since the last time it loaded it.

In that case there would be hardly any extra load at all.