PDA

View Full Version : Most traffic --> movie or pic galleries?


bigsexvideos
10-11-2001, 01:53 AM
I was wondering which would be the most popular for surfers: a text-link to a pic gallery saying "Ebony slut sucks lucky guy's cock" or a movie gallery w/ the same name?
In other words what galleries receive the most traffic.
And while we are at it. What traffic is the most productive: would it be the movie gallerie traffic that gets me most sign-ups or the pic gallerie traffic?

subog
10-11-2001, 01:57 AM
movie will generate more sign up than pic (if both movie and pic quality, sale technic... are the same) but movie = more bandwidth billz

bigsexvideos
10-11-2001, 03:04 AM
I know movies take more bandwith, but i would use a free host for this. I don't really believe that they take away that sign-ups. Or do they?
Anyway, if I promote ebony women and the movie host uses the typically 'long-haired blonde bimbos'-advertising, I'm pretty sure the ads won't take away my traffic.

Subog, have you made movie and pic galleries yourself? What was your ratio?

subog
10-11-2001, 03:10 AM
about 1:200 for pics
and 1:120 for movie

bigsexvideos
10-11-2001, 03:53 AM
Daaamn, that's pretty nice.
I tell you what:
give me an example gallerie you made
tell me your tricks
and i will sign-up using your ref-id.

What do you say?

subog
10-11-2001, 04:09 AM
no :p

bigsexvideos
10-11-2001, 04:11 AM
Can you at least show me an example gallery of yours?

XxxPower.net
10-11-2001, 10:18 AM
Try to make your own gallery, may be yours will generate more sign-ups then the subog's gallery.


If not try to make another. Do you think that someone showed the best template for gallery to subdog when he started in the biz ? I don't think so. Only creative guys with new ideas can make something in this business and survive in the competition.

Nasko

bigsexvideos
10-11-2001, 10:38 AM
Honestly XxxPower, do you believe I was going to copy subog's whole template?

I just thought 1:200 for pics
and 1:120 for movie was a rather high sign-up ratio these days, so I wanted to know what sponsors he used and basically just see how he put it together.

But I guess he's scared to show his work.
I guess he's right w/ 100s of wannabe-webmasters able to copy it.

baddog
10-11-2001, 10:45 AM
subog,

you want us to believe you got 1:200 with TGP static pics? Gotta wonder how much you are messing up the averages for everyone else. If industry average is 1:2000 and you have 1:200 someone is definately getting screwed.

XxxPower.net
10-11-2001, 10:48 AM
Originally posted by bigsexvideos:
<STRONG>Honestly XxxPower, do you believe I was going to copy subog's whole template?

I just thought 1:200 for pics
and 1:120 for movie was a rather high sign-up ratio these days, so I wanted to know what sponsors he used and basically just see how he put it together.

But I guess he's scared to show his work.
I guess he's right w/ 100s of wannabe-webmasters able to copy it.</STRONG>


The sign-up ratio depends not only on the gallery design. The traffic quality is important, the position of the listed gallery is important and there are many other important things to have sucessful gallery...

richard
10-11-2001, 11:36 AM
Originally posted by subog:
<STRONG>no :p</STRONG>

lol.

theo
10-11-2001, 01:10 PM
Originally posted by XxxPower.net:
<STRONG>


The sign-up ratio depends not only on the gallery design. The traffic quality is important, the position of the listed gallery is important and there are many other important things to have sucessful gallery...</STRONG>


kalhspera file, ti kanoyme?

subog
10-11-2001, 06:16 PM
bad_dog, bigsexvideos asked about my average ratio, and I just told him... I dont care what other think!

matuloo
10-11-2001, 09:20 PM
Actually, I didnt have big problems getting a 1:250 ratio with a pic gallery, the problem was to make those 250 surfers click that fucking link :)

baddog
10-11-2001, 09:28 PM
Originally posted by matuloo:
<STRONG>Actually, I didnt have big problems getting a 1:250 ratio with a pic gallery, the problem was to make those 250 surfers click that fucking link :)</STRONG>

yeah, no shit :D

bramdaman
10-12-2001, 01:07 AM
Originally posted by bad_dog:
<STRONG>

yeah, no shit :D</STRONG>

Same here, I'm at abt 1:250 - 1:300 but I just don't get them to click. But maybe when they all strat clicking the rato drops to 1:1000 or so?

Bear
10-12-2001, 09:00 AM
Wait, I am a little bit confuse. What you guys means by 1:250 or 1:300 ratio?

Is it mean every 300 visit to your gallery page and you generate one sign up?

Or every 300 visits to your site(from gallery page) and you get one sign up?

matuloo
10-12-2001, 10:21 AM
Bear :)

if 300 visitors to a pic gallery would generate a sale I would already have my garage full of ferraris, porsches etc ... :D

what we mean by 1:200 is that out of 200 clicks to our sponsor link 1 surfer signs up.

The problem is that sometimes you need 50 000 visits to your gallery to get those 200 clicks.

bramdaman you are right, it would be probably possible to increase the clicks by using some rather misleading text but the ratios would drop a lot.

I just cant get myself to understand the silly mind of a tgp surfer :p