View Full Version : p=60, p=70 or p=80 ?
Jizar ll
12-03-2001, 11:04 AM
HI i was wondering if anyone here have been experimenting much with the % out to the galleries, and what the effect will be if i raise it, obvious the ammount out to trade partners will decrese by raising the p= but will it be better in the long run?
regards
Jizar
diesel
12-03-2001, 11:14 AM
You will gain more bookmarks and better prod on sites you trade with.
Jizar ll
12-03-2001, 11:36 AM
ok i see:-) do you think that if i raise my % from 60 to 70% my site will still be able to grow or will it decrease until i get more bookmarkers?
xApster
12-03-2001, 11:38 AM
It all depends on your design but I am pretty sure it will drop.. you wont get many bookmarkers unless you have p=90 or something :)
Why would someone bookmark a ucj tgp when you can go to the hun :)
Jizar ll
12-03-2001, 11:43 AM
xapster: yeah i see your point :(
but i have just looked at many tgpīs that have P=70 or P=75 and wondered why they didnīdrop it to 60 and then they would grow much.. but then again if the result of raising to P=70 is that people click 20% more then the outclick to trades will be allmost similar..?
xapster is absolutly right.. iīd personally choose 75%..
xApster
12-03-2001, 01:57 PM
I am not saying you wont get any but people go with =75 becuase
a. You can send more traffic to your own galleries which = more $$$
b. The more content people go to the higher your prod gets
c. It just looks better to send more to content :)
shane94
12-03-2001, 07:07 PM
Well IMO for traffic reasons I would not go below P=70. Here is my theory :p If you send a lot more blind link traffic to people then your production will drop and UCJ will send you less back. So it is not always good to send a high amount back but the send QUALITY hits.
Shane
Buzzman
12-03-2001, 07:13 PM
Hey guys, I think you have to find a balance between your blink links and your out %. By that I mean if you have it set to 60 and have a ton of blink outs in your gallery listings who the hell is gonna want to come back the next day. I did this with my site and while traffic grows for a couple of days it quickly dies because nobody comes back (I think).
I have redesigned and let my site die. I have no blind outs (and it really died). But, it seems to be growing a little bit each day.
So I'm gonna add some perm links but I'm also going to up it to 75. The sufer has to have something to look at, right? If it is a TGP.
Just a thought.
Burtman
vovan!
12-03-2001, 09:28 PM
What about this theory?
The more surfers click on your site the worse your prod will be at your trades. Why? Becuase, f.i. first 2 times they went to your galleries. Then script sends them to your trade. They just won't click there, cuase they know that there is more content left on your site, and will continue clicking on your site... Plus, there are lots of surfers that open multiple windows when the site loads and then waiting for all windows to load. If not a gallery, they just close the window.
Carneal
12-04-2001, 03:30 AM
i personally would mix them up.. have top 3-5links =100 and anything lower drop thats waht i do and it works like a charm
Doctor Dre
12-04-2001, 05:34 AM
Originally posted by vovan!:
<STRONG>What about this theory?
The more surfers click on your site the worse your prod will be at your trades. Why? Becuase, f.i. first 2 times they went to your galleries. Then script sends them to your trade. They just won't click there, cuase they know that there is more content left on your site, and will continue clicking on your site... Plus, there are lots of surfers that open multiple windows when the site loads and then waiting for all windows to load. If not a gallery, they just close the window.</STRONG>
Nah it don't change nothing ... If your site have 75 % to gallery and you trade with other sitse at 75 % it will be good ... if you trade with 80 to 50 % it will be bad ... cauz after once people will just close your site cauz they know you will send them another place. That's why most trading site sending less than 75 change their layout often .
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.