PDA

View Full Version : Amateur


CowboySurfers.com
03-03-2001, 03:24 AM
Is it just me .. or is amateur a code word for ugly softcore pic.

rukbunker
03-03-2001, 03:33 AM
kinda i guess

Mike
http://fuckablebitches.com

wolfshade
03-03-2001, 03:33 AM
That's a matter of opinion and taste I think http://bbs.adultwebmasterinfo.com/ubb/wink.gif

I do know that it converts well for me http://bbs.adultwebmasterinfo.com/ubb/wink.gif

So to me it's a code for damn good niche http://bbs.adultwebmasterinfo.com/ubb/wink.gif

Wolfshade

richard
03-03-2001, 03:43 AM
nah, i don't think it is.

Solo girl, amateur shoots can have some stunning models in, but the shoot does not have them all made up in some perfect setting.

But i guess you're going to get more uglies in amoungst them though.

I think the turn on for the surfer is that these are "real" people having "real" sex.

Mikey
03-03-2001, 10:22 PM
I have always wondered that. I always get confused with the amateur/babe choice when having to decide. Usually I choose amateur, it converts better for me than babe. Unless of course the shoot looks so professional, playboy type, then it is babe.

aprilvirgo
03-04-2001, 12:17 PM
It's hard to lose with amateur, good amateur that is. The content is less expensive, people seem to dig it, and it converts well for me. The only problem is finding good content. Some providers tend to think that any crack whore off the street will do.

magnatique
03-04-2001, 12:29 PM
the point behind amateur is that you'll see girls that you could see tomorrow waiting for the bus... beautiful girl next-door kinda thing..

not those sillicon, remodelled, boosted bimbos that you keep on seeing everywhere..

at least, that's the point of view of amateur lovers...


so mainly, it's the chance to see new faces, and "real" girls..

the fact that you think it's ugly softcore pics is that unlike with models, they don't have backgrounds... they don't need to be proven to be goddesses... therefore some photographers take pictures of everything they can...

Shovel
03-04-2001, 02:20 PM
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">

not those sillicon, remodelled, boosted bimbos that you keep on seeing everywhere..
</font>

You can keep your amateur scroggers, give me a Vivid girl every time... http://bbs.adultwebmasterinfo.com/ubb/biggrin.gif

Mikey
03-04-2001, 07:36 PM
I agree with Mag, Amateur is supposed to be the everyday girl who doesn't pose for pics for money, just the thrill. Atleast that is how I always thought of it from the good 'ole days of Hustler magazine's Beaver Hunt section, where women would send in their pics because they loved the thought that guys were getting off on their pics.

magnatique
03-04-2001, 08:18 PM
the best would be voyeurweb.com....

Igor sure is doing a great job http://bbs.adultwebmasterinfo.com/ubb/smile.gif

Wizzo
03-05-2001, 07:48 AM
amateur doesn't equal ugly on amateurpages...Those amateurs are HOT http://www.plauder-smilies.de/smokin.gif

In most cases I think your right!

magnatique
03-05-2001, 12:09 PM
never checked amateurpages insides though... but the reputation is there my man http://bbs.adultwebmasterinfo.com/ubb/wink.gif