Warning! for those promoting teenfuns

[Dirty Dough]

I've seen galleries around from them sometimes and I though these girls look much too young...

Not trusting it I decided to do some investigation.

Apart from the site teenfuns, they also run the site teensfix.com.
See Whois Teensfix (http://www.whois.sc/teensfix.com) notice the SSL certificate

Now there used to be a underaged site called l*****fix
I though: maybe its coincidence that they both have somewhat the same name. So I looked the site up in the internet archive.

This is what I found in the "about us" section.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030408060100/www.l*****fix.com/intro/default.htm

Now, compare that text with this one....
http://www.teensfix.com/about/default.php?nox=0

Well, another whois proved them to be affiliated: http://www.whois.sc/l*****fix.com

So, This could all be a strange case of coincidence. But I would advice anyone using them to drop them immediately!!

(After consideration I decided not to post the full domain, it is easy enough to find out anyways...)

[aw-tolik]

it legal content - site working under ccbill - so they not illegal.

[Dirty Dough]

Maybe... But they used to run a underaged site...

[Viking]

Originally posted by aw-tolik
it legal content - site working under ccbill - so they not illegal.

From what I know there has been cases where sites at CCbill hasn't been using legal content.
After CCbill received a notice from whoever the sites were taken down.

[aw-tolik]

Originally posted by Viking
From what I know there has been cases where sites at CCbill hasn't been using legal content.
After CCbill received a notice from whoever the sites were taken down.

yes - i heard about this also - but it not new site - i mean teenfuns.

2 Dirty Dough - these people can buy ready site from someone - isnt it?

why they should change something at working site?

[Dirty Dough]

Originally posted by aw-tolik

2 Dirty Dough - these people can buy ready site from someone - isnt it?

why they should change something at working site?

You mean they could have bought teensfix?
They could have. And then they purchased lo****fix in the deal. Because according to whois that linked to teenfuns.

But why would you buy a site and incriminate yourself when you know the seller did filthy underaged content??

This stuff smells fishy.

Maybe people don't give a shit, but don't say I haven't warned you....

[aw-tolik]

Originally posted by Dirty Dough


Maybe people don't give a shit, but don't say I haven't warned you....

i know what site you talking about.

see - from legal viewpoint - when you joining programm - you dealing with current programm. not with these 51 whois changes pointed too.

looks like you not too long into this business - it why you react like this and hiding urls with *** ;)

from other hand - i cannot disagree what it some smell from past maybe.

i sent this thread url to current owner of teenfuns - also - alot of people from AWI promoute this programm.

let see - maybe he register and answer here - but this programm have own webmasters board, if you didnt know.

[Good Samaritan]

What facts give you a reason to hurl such a serious but unjust accusation ?
Why do you speak about filthy underaged content?
Do you have the documents confirm that teenfuns.com or Funs Empire partnership program uses not legal content ?

I think the word lolita in the old domain name scares you so much.

The all old webmasters know some years ago many absolutely legal sites had the word lolita or lo in their domains.
Visa and billing companies decided to forbid using this word in domains of teen sites. The owners of these sites replaced the word lolita by the word teen.

Try to write lolita.org in your browser and you'll get to littleapril.com.
Does it mean triplexcash deals with children porno?

Think twice before making such a serious statements !

[Best-In-BC]

Good job

[sandman]

Originally posted by Dirty Dough
I've seen galleries around from them sometimes and I though these girls look much too young...

Not trusting it I decided to do some investigation.

Apart from the site teenfuns, they also run the site teensfix.com.
See Whois Teensfix (http://www.whois.sc/teensfix.com) notice the SSL certificate

Now there used to be a underaged site called l*****fix
I though: maybe its coincidence that they both have somewhat the same name. So I looked the site up in the internet archive.

This is what I found in the "about us" section.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030408060100/www.l*****fix.com/intro/default.htm

Now, compare that text with this one....
http://www.teensfix.com/about/default.php?nox=0

Well, another whois proved them to be affiliated: http://www.whois.sc/l*****fix.com

So, This could all be a strange case of coincidence. But I would advice anyone using them to drop them immediately!!

(After consideration I decided not to post the full domain, it is easy enough to find out anyways...)

I smell bullshit.

Even tho i cant sell their sites worth shit :(

I still smell bulshit!

[Good Samaritan]

don't sell this site if you don't like teen girls
it's your right


btw teenfuns is very popular teen site
the content isn't worse than MET or Hegre content but more revealing

about 1300 webmasters makes good money selling teenfuns

[Dirty Dough]

Originally posted by aw-tolik
i know what site you talking about.

see - from legal viewpoint - when you joining programm - you dealing with current programm. not with these 51 whois changes pointed too.

looks like you not too long into this business - it why you react like this and hiding urls with *** ;)

from other hand - i cannot disagree what it some smell from past maybe.

i sent this thread url to current owner of teenfuns - also - alot of people from AWI promoute this programm.

let see - maybe he register and answer here - but this programm have own webmasters board, if you didnt know.

AW-TOLIK, Its total bullshit saying I'm not long in this biz judging by my posts above.
I agree that the current site may be legal, but if they used to do underaged crap then I don't want to have anything to do with them.
I hide the URL because I don't want to link to underaged crap from this board, even if it is on archive.org
I think the mods appreciate that.

[BIGTYMER]

This looks like a job for the North Circuit Internet Police Modem Squad. ;)

[Dirty Dough]

Originally posted by Good Samaritan
What facts give you a reason to hurl such a serious but unjust accusation ?
Why do you speak about filthy underaged content?
Do you have the documents confirm that teenfuns.com or Funs Empire partnership program uses not legal content ?

I think the word lolita in the old domain name scares you so much.

The all old webmasters know some years ago many absolutely legal sites had the word lolita or lo in their domains.
Visa and billing companies decided to forbid using this word in domains of teen sites. The owners of these sites replaced the word lolita by the word teen.

Try to write lolita.org in your browser and you'll get to littleapril.com.
Does it mean triplexcash deals with children porno?

Think twice before making such a serious statements !

Isn't teensfix owned by you?
Didn't lo****fix used to be your site? If not, why did it link directly to teenfuns?
Didn't lo****fix used to have underaged content?

[V_RocKs]

Originally posted by Good Samaritan

Do you have the documents confirm that teenfuns.com or Funs Empire partnership program uses not legal content ?

Umm... dude, if you had the documentation, it'd be legal... since there isn't really any... it isn't.

[aw-tolik]

Originally posted by Dirty Dough
they used to do underaged crap

explain this. you count as proof word lolita in domain?

or 51 whois records changes?

[aw-tolik]

Originally posted by Dirty Dough

Didn't lo****fix used to have underaged content?

hm

how you can know this?

if this site not work anymore?

looks like you frequently visiting cp sites if you know sites what as you said "used to have underaged content" - dont you?

[Dirty Dough]

Originally posted by aw-tolik

looks like you frequently visiting cp sites if you know sites what as you said "used to have underaged content" - dont you?

Fuck off.. Why do you defend these guys so much?

If you look up the site on the archive.org you'll see it.

If that isn't underaged content then I guess he did his very best for them to look like they are underaged.
That is almost equally sickening for me.

It seems that people don't really give a fuck about this all. I just wanted to give out a warning... If people don't mind, thats their choice. All the info is here to read.

I'm out.

[aw-tolik]

Originally posted by Dirty Dough
Fuck off..

same goes to you



Originally posted by Dirty Dough

Why do you defend these guys so much?


not your business

Originally posted by Dirty Dough

If you look up the site on the archive.org you'll see it.



1st - i dont have free time for waste to search of some useless for me shit.

2nd - unlike you i dont interested in searching for underage sites at archive.org or how this site called.

[BIGTYMER]

Those girls do look mighty young...

[V_RocKs]

Originally posted by aw-tolik
hm

how you can know this?

if this site not work anymore?

looks like you frequently visiting cp sites if you know sites what as you said "used to have underaged content" - dont you?

Well, if you use the internet archive link he gave you, you'd know that lolitafix has had CP on it.

[V_RocKs]

Originally posted by aw-tolik
same goes to you

not your business

1st - i dont have free time for waste to search of some useless for me shit.

2nd - unlike you i dont interested in searching for underage sites at archive.org or how this site called.

It is people like you that make me NOT use FPC or any other sponsor you are promoting... Do your sponsors a favor and either just shut the fuck up or remove them from your sig.

[aw-tolik]

Originally posted by V_RocKs
It is people like you that make me NOT use FPC or any other sponsor you are promoting...

does someone force you?

anyway - it only amateurpages left for you then - because i lost my password to this programm.

[aw-tolik]

Originally posted by V_RocKs
Well, if you use the internet archive link he gave you, you'd know that lolitafix has had CP on it.

ok - try to explain - why i should follow some link to some site for look - cp this or not if i DONT interested in visiting CP sites?

i just dont care what YOU or this other guy see at this site. not me visit these sites - right?.

owner of teenfuns registred at awi and told already what teenfuns - legal partnership programm with all required docs.

if these girls looks young for you - hold ALT key at keyboard and press F4.

it called freedom of choise - but you already done your choise - so you dont have other way anymore.

[Heinz]

Originally posted by Good Samaritan
What facts give you a reason to hurl such a serious but unjust accusation ?
Why do you speak about filthy underaged content?
Do you have the documents confirm that teenfuns.com or Funs Empire partnership program uses not legal content ?

I think the word lolita in the old domain name scares you so much.

The all old webmasters know some years ago many absolutely legal sites had the word lolita or lo in their domains.
Visa and billing companies decided to forbid using this word in domains of teen sites. The owners of these sites replaced the word lolita by the word teen.

Try to write lolita.org in your browser and you'll get to littleapril.com.
Does it mean triplexcash deals with children porno?

Think twice before making such a serious statements !

It's not the domain name that scares me. I clicked on the link to the web.archive.org and changed the ***** to lolita. What I saw was this kind of shit that makes me run the cleaner. I don't know whether it's cp or not, but these pictures seem to be very very young.

As far as I understand, DirtyDough didn't accuse you to use underage content on teenfuns.com. DirtyDough found some indications that you are the owner of l******fix.com and that this site was using underage content.

So, what is your reply to this?

And there is no need for this name dropping, littleapril here or metart and hegre there. It makes you look like a fool.

[aw-tolik]

Originally posted by Heinz
It's not the domain name that scares me. I clicked on the link to the web.archive.org and changed the ***** to lolita. What I saw was this kind of shit that makes me run the cleaner. I don't know whether it's cp or not, but these pictures seem to be very very young.

As far as I understand, DirtyDough didn't accuse you to use underage content on teenfuns.com. DirtyDough found some indications that you are the owner of l******fix.com and that this site was using underage content.

So, what is your reply to this?

And there is no need for this name dropping, littleapril here or metart and hegre there. It makes you look like a fool.


well - atleast someone ask right question. without making personal attacks and similar bullshit.

[Dirty Dough]

Originally posted by aw-tolik
well - atleast someone ask right question. without making personal attacks and similar bullshit.

I haven't started any personal attacks... I'm sorry if you percieved it that way.

[Dirty Dough]

Originally posted by Heinz
It's not the domain name that scares me. I clicked on the link to the web.archive.org and changed the ***** to lolita. What I saw was this kind of shit that makes me run the cleaner. I don't know whether it's cp or not, but these pictures seem to be very very young.

As far as I understand, DirtyDough didn't accuse you to use underage content on teenfuns.com. DirtyDough found some indications that you are the owner of l******fix.com and that this site was using underage content.

So, what is your reply to this?

And there is no need for this name dropping, littleapril here or metart and hegre there. It makes you look like a fool.

That was indeed why I started this thread

[aw-tolik]

Originally posted by Dirty Dough
I haven't started any personal attacks... I'm sorry if you percieved it that way.

ok, let forget about this.

peace.