Opinions on TGSW

[Sticks]

I am thinking of getting TGSW. How good is it? I have different material e.g. teen / asian / mature. Looking at the on-line demo, there didn't seem to be an option for setting up different material and submitting appropriately.

Thanks

[Due]

TGSW is probably the best auto submiter out there.
You should just remember to follow the rules and use UNIQUE content.... not a bunch of sponsor pix.
you can setup templates for each niche site or each TGP if you wan't or you can have everysite on the same template.
The setup time takes a long time but then you will never have to lift a finger after then. only upload new content! :-)

[Namejs]

My setup took 2 days. You have to update your database from time to time and check if rules have changed. But it´s working well

[baddog]

The best auto-submitter out there? Hardly. www.sitemogul.com (http://www.sitemogul.com) kicks its ass and now has its Unlimited version which not only allows you to use your own gallery design or the one provided with the program, also can be used on multiple domains. One other thing, you don't need to go to each TGP to verify their rules because they are already part of the program. Takes possibly an hour to set up (if you do a real thorough setup) and 10 minutes a day to run it.

Does it work?http://stats1.porntrack.com/stats/general.phtml?stSITE_ID=12894
More than just an auto-submitter too, with every resource a webmaster might want courtesy of Netpond and others, and a mass file renamer to assist in your setting up to use the program. It's not a server based script, but a Windows based program that runs on your hdd. Anyone that thinks TGSW is the best has not tried SiteMogul. Go look at their sample page, then check us out.

[Avatar]

bad_dog I believe the subject was tgsw opinions.

[Coke]

hmmmm

this spam is getting REALLY annoying

[baddog]

Originally posted by Avatar:
bad_dog I believe the subject was tgsw opinions.

true enough, but someone said "probably the best auto submiter out there" and it would be a dis-service to let them think that was true.

[baddog]

oh if someone asks about a dialer program and a slew of alternative dialer programs are mentioned it's okay, but if I mention sitemogul when auto-submitters are discussed it becomes spam?

[Avatar]

bad_dog, you didn't even mention tgsw... but just promoted you own..
If someone asked a opinon about NCC and snows only comment was how good his dialer*** was it would have been the same.
Nothing personal. It's just getting annoying to see the same old messages.

And yes, I do run tgsw http://adultwebmasterinfo.com/ubb/smile.gif

[Juggler]

Bad_dog just a bit of back ground info you started using this board after SPAMMING a tgp board on netpond about how you hated CJER'S now you feel you have to KEEP spamming your software well personally I ASK is that because you are really bad at selling it because TGSW does the same job for a LOT less $$$ or do you just LIKE spamming

Have a good day

[Due]

bad_dog>
I don't see why your software is better than TGSW. Actually TGSW looks better.
Why?
Page Creation - Your program does that. TGSW does that
Page Submission: your program does that BUT you have to click a button. TGSW does it while you are sleeping
Places: Your program does TGP, PP, SE. So can TGSW, you can add them on the fly. Can you add new TGP's SE's PP on your program?
Renamer: Your program has that, TGSW don't. But what should I use it for?
Resources: What should we use it for? we are only posting to TGP's
Browser: when I tried it it sucked big time
Updates: TGSW also has updates every now and then
FREE: Made my windows crash. Several times.
What about free hosts? does your program support both free hosts that offer FTP and the ones with a file manager like porncity?
Also you are most likely going to say that TGSW is banned from most TGP's but they are not!
Here is some of the reasons that many TGSW users don't get listet:
submit crappy pix
layout sux
they spam with several install (the same thing that your new wonderfull version support)
pretty nice stats BTW... 44K unique today? when I was using the TGSW on my own domain I had around 100K / unique to the galleries /day. after 2 weeks
When I used it on my westmaster.com account I had it running for 1½ week then I was kicked from their unl. hosting when I used around ½ mbps on the galleries.
Actually it looks like that TGSW is A LOT better than yours. Also support categories with templates for each category. so you can have asian banners on asian galleries, teen on teen etc.

[Due]

I completely forgot.
TGSW - $179.95
Yours - $2K or something right?

[Coke]

Several good reasons to buy TGSW. + I don't pay people money who need to spam in regular boards in order to get purchasers.
Another good reason to buy TGSW http://adultwebmasterinfo.com/ubb/smile.gif I have never seen any spam about it just reports from happy webmasters using it.

[baddog]

I won't bother responding as it appears that it is not desired. Not that I couldn't mention that the Pro is $245, or other inaccurate comments, but as it appears the mere mention of our program makes it spam, I will refrain.

[Sticks]

Thanks for the feedback guys.

[DK?]

Where can I get TGSW?
Being as though noone's spammed it.

[Namejs]

http://www.worldadult.com/tgsw/

[DK?]

gracias

Originally posted by Namejs:
http://www.worldadult.com/tgsw/

[shane]

Does anyone still actually submit galleries manually? and if so why?
Sitemogal, seems like an over priced waste of money, I wouldnt bother with that, however
TGSW rocks! once installed, you never need to do anything again!

[sandman]

I still submit by hand but im getting a dedicated box in a few weeks so i will be buying a prog also http://adultwebmasterinfo.com/ubb/smile.gif

[Reed]

# The best auto-submitter out there? Hardly. www.sitemogul.com (http://www.sitemogul.com) kicks its ass


TGSW submits to 481 TGP's. I've averaged 100K visitors a day using it. It's clearly cheaper and more practical then sitemogul. I've tried sitemogul and it was the only program to ever crash my Windows 2000. The install was a joke and the actual coding was a nightmare.


# Not that I couldn't mention that the Pro is $245

TGSW:
Professional Edition $179.95
Standard Edition $89.95

[Mogul]

Yes I agree that the 'best' submitter out there lies in the hands of the owner. For some it may be SiteMogul, for others some other program like TGSW.

The program was mainly designed for our use only but we opened it up to others.

As far as "The install was a joke and the actual coding was a nightmare." by reed

You may want to think before you speak next time. I am not going to flame or go into detail except that it is evident that you either A. did not install or B. can not read oh and C. have no clue what you are talking about as per your statement.

As far as TGSW goes, I have heard pros and cons as with anything else. I say give it a shot. I mean really $200 or whatever is an excellent price if it works for you.

Also a comment was made that with our program you must hit a button and with TGSW it works while you sleep. True but our program submits everything to everywhere in about 10 minutes. My version works automatically and I don't have to hit shit.
;-)

In conclusion, The program(mogul) helps those without their own server, access to perl, etc.. Also YES to another question about adding sites. What program worth a shit would not allow this. Personally, I think you should try TGSW and leave Mogul alone. Also what Bad Dog does not know is that the unlimited version (not released) was actually tested a while back and our test was doing up to 300k hits a day uniques. This scared me as most people whould shit a cow if they started getting blasted like that. Thus, I toned down the program.
By the way, I own the company and yes I am telling you this.

[baddog]

well I found I could respond to the inaccurate comments made earlier, its on the spam board if interested.

[Reed]

Sitemogul has probably been refined since I tried it in May. I apologize for being so harsh. SiteMogul3-0-0BETA.exe and sitemogul3-1.exe had problems with Win 2000 but ran on win98. If I remember correctly I was getting Overflow and Bounds Errors. It's not hard to decompile VB source code. It's just a matter of time for your programming skills to match the expectations I had for your product.

[Mogul]

REED,

It was not designed for Win2000 sytem (which is NT). It was designed for the Home OS Architecture. Knowing that you were using 2000, I now know you had errors as did I.

As far as coding:
1. Yes it is easy to RE it. No de-RE methods were implimented because this is not what I consider a high-end project. Just some crap for the porn industry.
2. I doubt you did RE it but who cares. No big deal.
3. The guts were not in the EXE file anyway. It is nothing more than a host for dll calls and GUI coding.
4. VB is a shitty language. It was used as another programer was working on this project also and only knew VB. Ahh but it gets the job done as they say. I don't care for the language much myself unless writing simple stuff that does not take much resources.

Lastly, I actually did write up a version for use on a Win 2000 machine for personal use. Also it should have been pointed out at the site that it was for 98 NOT 2000 as they are different architectures.

Well good luck in your adult ventures.